by Emily Herd
I recently had the following conversation with a two-year-old:
Me: What did the farmer give the cows to eat?
Boy: It wasnโt a farmer. It was aย lady.
This dialogue reveals something depressing but not totally surprising. By the age of two, this child has already absorbed the cultural messages we are all bombarded with: that some roles are for women and others are for men. The fact that this gem of 21st century sexism came from a boy is not really relevant, since, having discussed the interaction with various friends and colleagues, many report similar conversations with young girls as well as boys. For example:
โYou canโt sit there Mummy [in the driverโs seat]. Thatโs Daddyโs seat.โ
โThis is for girls โ itโs got flowers on it.โ
And my particular favourite:
โBoys donโt cry!โ
Thereโs a powerful YouTube video created by an organisation called โInspiring the futureโ in which a class of primary school children are asked to draw a firefighter, a surgeon and a fighter pilot. The vast majority โ girls and boys โ draw men. The power of the video lies in the gasps of amazement when the real thing walk inโฆ and they are all female. In case we didnโt already have our heads in our hands, one child says โTheyโre dressed up!โ in complete disbelief that these women might actually do these jobs.
This state of affairs is damaging for boys as well as girls. Prevailing cultural norms that prevent boys from being able to express themselves fully and pursue whatever interests they may have are limiting and unhelpful to both sexes.
So where do these prejudices come from? And how can our young learnersโ teaching be honed to counteract these subconscious assumptions?
Looking beyond ELT for a moment, in our house we have a recently published Ladybird book, containing the following text:
Itโs early morning on Blossom Farm and the cows are being milked. Flo, the farmerโs wife, gets the milking machine ready. Farmer Fergus leads the cows in.
Farm Hullaballoo! by Justine Smith published by Penguin, 2011
Can you spot the problem?
Flo is just as much a farmer as Fergus, as far as responsibilities go, but here sheโs โthe farmerโs wifeโ. When was the last time you saw a female farmer in a book, I wonder? Itโs rather unfair of me to single out Ladybird books, since this kind of thing is so widespread we barely notice it. ELT materials are, unfortunately, no exception. Though the editorial process for major ELT publishers does include checks for gender representation, it relies on authors and editors to actively engage with the idea of promoting gender equality. Itโs not always top of their list of competing priorities. And as writing and editing schedules are increasingly squeezed, many such areas of quality control are under pressure.
I recently asked around on Facebook for examples of sexism in ELT materials. In reply, I received a few really appalling examples, but the majority were the sort of persistent everyday sexism we might easily overlook. Itโs the subtle sexism Iโd argue might be particularly pernicious. The examples Iโve seen show that thereโs still a tendency to show women in domestic and nurturing roles more often than men. I saw one reader in which a dad panics in helpless despair when his son realises theyโve run out of jam. In the end, mum comes to the rescue with a new jar sheโs found in the kitchen. What kind of message does this send to boys, as potential future fathers? The depiction of useless dads is quite common โ Peppa Pigโs dad is another example from mainstream culture โ but hugely damaging. An overview of material also shows that teachers are much more commonly shown as female than male. In general, though, men are still more likely to be shown in professional contexts (either explicitly or through artwork). Men and boys are often given more dynamic character traits and a more active role, while women and girls are more likely to be depicted as passive.
As a teacher, what can I do?
In Stockholm, there are five gender-neutral pre-schools. In these settings, children are never referred to as โhimโ or โherโ but only by name or as โfriendโ, with the aim of combatting gender stereotyping and giving students the same opportunities. Itโs a controversial initiative, but one which opens up the debate: if even very young children perceive gender as different, then what can we do to make sure this doesnโt become discriminatory or self-limiting? Here are some ideas:
- Avoid splitting classes into teams of girls against boys. Avoid anything that signals difference between boys and girls on a conscious or subconscious level, e.g. fancy dress outfits โfor girlsโ or โfor boysโ, or giving out different prizes or different stationery on the basis of gender. (This all sounds obvious but itโs unbelievably common.)
- Include gender representation in your list of criteria for materials selection. Where possible, adapt or skip course book pages that you donโt feel meet a sufficiently high standard. Complain to the courseโs Commissioning Editors โ why not? (It may result in a change at reprint, or be rewritten for a new edition. At the very least it will raise awareness.)
- Search for inspiring texts about empowered girls and women. Consciously seek balance โ if your class is learning about inspiring musicians, artists, athletes or inventors, for example, ensure you include as many brilliant women as men. Remember: children canโt be what they canโt see.
- Young Learner materials at low levels often focus on domestic life. Home, toys, kitchen, clothesโฆ the opportunities for sexism abound. Keep a watchful eye on the subliminal messages being sent, both in the course books and in the questions you ask. Ask yourself: โIn an ideal world, what would gender-equal domestic responsibilities look like? How would children play? How would they dress?โ rather than โDoes this reflect the reality for my students in 2017?โ
- Create a bank of visuals which you like, and think could be a good substitute for published ones youโre unhappy with.
- Encourage learners to be critical consumers of visuals โ Do you think this picture is realistic? Why are there no boys in this picture? Etc.
- Encourage learners to call out sexism when they spot it. I recently heard a wonderful story about an English class in Spain where young teenagers expressed outrage that the โGuess Who?โ board game they were playing to practise questions included far more men than women. Thereโs a fantastic opportunity here to learn how to write letters of complaint, isnโt there?
- Make a conscious effort to use and teach gender neutral language: firefighter, police officer, actor, head teacher. Avoid redundancy: female pilot, lady farmer. In fact, avoid โladyโ altogether unless itโs a context in which youโd naturally also use โgentlemenโ.
- Teach learners that in English, unlike many other languages, you cannot use the male pronoun to signify both his and her. For example, itโs only acceptable to say โThe astronaut flew his spaceshipโ if we know that the astronaut in this sentence is male (for further analysis of this, Jemma Prior has written aย useful blogย about gender neutral language in ELT here, with a focus on adult learners). Very recently we saw the news that Cardiff Metropolitan University has controversiallyย banned the use of 34 words and phrases deemed to be sexist, including โmankindโ and โsportsmanshipโ. Whether or not you think this is a good decision, itโs worth considering that in order to be able to be able to communicate confidently in this kind of environment, the young learners of today will need to be aware of the issues around gendered language and not wrong-footed by them in their future careers.
- Consider joining the Women in ELT Facebook group, which includes discussion of lesson plans promoting gender equality, as well as being a friendly forum for much wider discussions. The group is currently only open to women, following a vote by its 900+ members, but this will be reviewed on an annual basis.
As a final word, Iโd add that in the classroom we have an opportunity to control the messages and images children are exposed to. Itโs a small window of the day when we have their attention. By being discerning in our choice of materials and self-critical about our own language and behaviour, we can make a real impact in shaping attitudes.
Authorโs Bio: Emily Hird is a freelance ELT writer, editor and publishing consultant, specialising in young learners. Having been an ELT teacher at the Bell School and International House in Spain, she worked at Cambridge University Press for a decade, including four busy years as Publisher for ELT Primary. She now divides her time between editorial and writing work. You can find her on twitter @eahird and on her blog: https://emilyhirdblog.wordpress.com/blog/
|
References: Smith, Justine Farm Hullaballoo! (2011) London: Penguin. Further info Swedish gender-neutral pre-schools:ย https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/feb/02/swedish-schools-gender-alien-concept Cardiff Metropolitan University bans sexist phrasesย http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/university-cardiff-metropolitan-bans-phrases-mankind-gentlemans-agreement-gender-neutral-terms-free-a7609521.html |